SKU: 53499764023

Caiman Rugged Front CV Axle for Polaris 1332881, Chromoly, Left or Right

Sale price$80.99 Regular price$89.99
Save 10%

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 15 - Jul 20

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Caiman Rugged Front CV Axle for Polaris 1332881, Chromoly, Left or RightThis new CV axle will fit front left or right on the following Polaris 4x4s. 2011 2012 Sportsman 400 2007 Sportsman 450 2007 2012 Sportsman 500 4x4 2006 2009 Sportsman X2 500 2007 2008 Sportsman 700 X2 700 2007 2012 Sportsman 800 4x4 & 6x6 (includes X2 models) Axle Specs: Compressed Length 539. 5 mm inobard Spline Count 22 outboard Spline Count 20 Replaces OE # 1332471, 1332501, 1332881

This new CV axle will fit front left or right on the following Polaris 4x4s.

2011-2012 ... Sportsman 400

2007 ... Sportsman 450

2007-2012 ... Sportsman 500 4x4

2006-2009 ... Sportsman X2 500

2007-2008 ... Sportsman 700 / X2 700

2007-2012 ... Sportsman 800 4x4 & 6x6
(includes X2 models)

Axle Specs:

Compressed Length - 539.5 mm

inobard Spline Count - 22

outboard Spline Count - 20

Replaces OE # 1332471, 1332501, 1332881

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 53499764023

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.0 ★★★★★
Based on 1042 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
C
Verified Purchase
Consumer Reports
San Leandro, US
★★★★★ 5
Fit great
Size: Large, Color: (100) White / White / Halo Gray
Been a couple of months and they seem to be holding up nicely. Real picky about fit of socks and these fit well. They are very thin but very comfortable.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 21, 2024
B
Verified Purchase
Broussard Household.
Birmingham, US
★★★★★ 5
Always a win
Size: Large, Color: (001) Black / Black / Castlerock
Under armor is always a win! Comfortable, no peeling, true to size, no squeezing around the arch of foot & affordable.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 4, 2026
T
Verified Purchase
tab
Grantham, US
★★★★★ 4
Fit well and stay up
Size: Large, Color: (299) City Khaki / City Khaki / White
They're a little thin, so good mainly for warmer months. But they fit very well and I've not experienced any slippage
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 17, 2026
G
Verified Purchase
Gustavo Garcia
Chelsea, US
★★★★★ 5
Llego a tiempo
Size: X-Large, Color: (001) Black / Black / Castlerock
Bien
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 28, 2026
V
Verified Purchase
ViperMageEx
Louisville, US
★★★★★ 3
Low quality socks.
Size: Large, Color: (001) Black / Black / Castlerock
I have been buying Under Armour undergarments for years and have noticed a steady decline in quality. These socks are no different. I purchased another six packs of very similar styled Under Armour socks in 2023 and recently they have started wearing out. Those socks are no longer available for reorder, but these extremely similar socks were so I ordered them. The quality difference is obvious just by looking at and feeling them. They are more of a faded black/brown than the black pictured or the black that the three year old socks still are. The material is completely different and feels lighter. When wearing them they already feel like they are bunching up in my shoes, which the old ones never did. I do not expect these to last even a year and will not buy them again.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 29, 2026

recommand products